The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Interpret plans and loading conditions
|
|
Applicable occupational health and safety (OHS), environmental, legislative and organisationalrequirements relevant to detailing truss or frame plans using advanced computerised systems are followed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Drawings and documentation are obtained and work requirements interpreted and checked Completed |
Evidence:
|
Plans are reviewed and loading information is interpreted Completed |
Evidence:
|
Drawing views and notes are reviewed and additional design requirements and restrictions are identified and followed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Additional information and data are obtained from appropriate personnel or sources Completed |
Evidence:
|
Functional and pictorial image of structure, trusses or frames is created based on design requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Design requirements outside normal software limitations are specified and appropriate assistance is sought Completed |
Evidence:
|
Communication with others is established and maintained in line with OHS requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Test design options and select best option
|
|
Fixed design details are transferred to layout data in line with software requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Frame or truss design types are specified and timber type and species are selected in line with material suitability and availability Completed |
Evidence:
|
Common industry spacing of frames, trusses and their components are set to the defined design structure in line with industry standards Completed |
Evidence:
|
Component sizes are fixed to clarify and firm design options Completed |
Evidence:
|
Layouts, spacing and sizing of individual structural members are progressively selected in line with software requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Design options are produced and design details selected, reviewed and revised in line with software and work order Completed |
Evidence:
|
Produce layouts and cutting requirements
|
|
Design records are reviewed for design integrity, completeness and consistency in line with applicable certifying authority standards Completed |
Evidence:
|
Structure layout drawings and truss or frame assembly drawings are produced using software in line with workplace and software requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Component cutting detail is produced in line with manufacturing requirements and schedules Completed |
Evidence:
|
Design records and documentation are completed and maintained in line with workplace procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Provide advice on design and production issues
|
|
Questions regarding design and assembly requirements are answered and explained comprehensively in a clear and concise manner Completed |
Evidence:
|
Effective communication techniques are used to assist and develop production personnel Completed |
Evidence:
|
Alternative materials and sizes for components are provided within the scope of the design and work requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Common site problems are discussed and prevention strategies are examined and adopted to ensure future site practice meets design requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|